Adaptation to compound climate risks: A systematic global stocktake

Author(s)Simpson, Nicholas P.
Author(s)Williams, Portia Adade
Author(s)Mach, Katharine J.
Author(s)Berrang-Ford, Lea
Author(s)Biesbroek, Robbert
Author(s)Haasnoot, Marjolijn
Author(s)Segnon, Alcade C.
Author(s)Campbell, Donovan
Author(s)Musah-Surugu, Justice Issah
Author(s)Joe, Elphin Tom
Author(s)Nunbogu, Abraham Marshall
Author(s)Sabour, Salma
Author(s)Meyer, Andreas L.S.
Author(s)Andrews, Talbot M.
Author(s)Singh, Chandni
Author(s)Siders, A.R.
Author(s)Lawrence, Judy
Author(s)van Aalst, Maarten
Author(s)Trisos, Christopher H.
Author(s)The Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative Team
Date Accessioned2023-04-18T20:51:07Z
Date Available2023-04-18T20:51:07Z
Publication Date2023-02-17
DescriptionThis article was originally published in iScience. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.105926
AbstractHighlights: • Compound climate impacts are particularly hard to adapt to • Compound vulnerabilities and exposures constrain adaptation capabilities • Inappropriate responses to climate change can lead to maladaptation • Compound impacts can have cascading effects on response options Summary: This article provides a stocktake of the adaptation literature between 2013 and 2019 to better understand how adaptation responses affect risk under the particularly challenging conditions of compound climate events. Across 39 countries, 45 response types to compound hazards display anticipatory (9%), reactive (33%), and maladaptive (41%) characteristics, as well as hard (18%) and soft (68%) limits to adaptation. Low income, food insecurity, and access to institutional resources and finance are the most prominent of 23 vulnerabilities observed to negatively affect responses. Risk for food security, health, livelihoods, and economic outputs are commonly associated risks driving responses. Narrow geographical and sectoral foci of the literature highlight important conceptual, sectoral, and geographic areas for future research to better understand the way responses shape risk. When responses are integrated within climate risk assessment and management, there is greater potential to advance the urgency of response and safeguards for the most vulnerable. Graphical abstract at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.105926
SponsorThis work was funded by the UK Government’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada grant no. 109419–001. ACS acknowledges financial support of the Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) project, funded by the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank.
CitationSimpson, Nicholas P., Portia Adade Williams, Katharine J. Mach, Lea Berrang-Ford, Robbert Biesbroek, Marjolijn Haasnoot, Alcade C. Segnon, et al. “Adaptation to Compound Climate Risks: A Systematic Global Stocktake.” IScience 26, no. 2 (February 17, 2023): 105926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.105926.
ISSN2589-0042
URLhttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/32660
Languageen_US
PublisheriScience
Keywordsearth sciences
Keywordsclimatology
Keywordssafety engineering
Keywordsbusiness
Keywordsdecision science
Keywordszero hunger
TitleAdaptation to compound climate risks: A systematic global stocktake
TypeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adaptation to compound climate risks A systematic global stocktake.pdf
Size:
5.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: