Why We Move: Social Mobility Behaviors of Non-Disabled and Disabled Children across Childcare Contexts

Author(s)Logan, Samuel W.
Author(s)Ross, Samantha Mae
Author(s)Schreiber, Melynda A.
Author(s)Feldner, Heather A.
Author(s)Lobo, Michele A.
Author(s)Catena, Michele A.
Author(s)MacDonald, Megan
Author(s)Galloway, James C.
Ordered AuthorSamuel W. Logan, Samantha Mae Ross, Melynda A. Schreiber, Heather A. Feldner, Michele A. Lobo, Michele A. Catena, Megan MacDonald and James C. Galloway
UD AuthorLobo, Michele A.en_US
UD AuthorGalloway, James C.en_US
Date Accessioned2017-04-07T14:58:19Z
Date Available2017-04-07T14:58:19Z
Copyright DateCopyright © 2016 Logan, Ross, Schreiber, Feldner, Lobo, Catena, MacDonald and Galloway.en_US
Publication Date2016-09-21
DescriptionPublisher's PDFen_US
AbstractBackground Social mobility is defined as the co-occurrence of self-directed locomotion and direct peer interaction. Social mobility is a product of dynamic child–environment interactions and thus likely to vary across contexts (e.g., classroom, gymnasium, and playground). Purpose The purpose of this present study was to examine differences in children’s social mobility: (1) across contexts by age and (2) between non-disabled and disabled children. Method Participants (n = 55 non-disabled and three disabled children; Mage = 3.1 years, SD = 1.4) were video recorded within a university-based early learning center. Children were recorded for 20 min in each context: classroom, gymnasium, and playground. A 15-s momentary time sampling method was used to code social mobility, the simultaneous occurrence of self-directed locomotion, and direct peer interaction. This variable was calculated as percent time within each context. Results A planned Friedman’s rank ANOVA (n = 55), stratified by age, indicated that older children (3–5 years old) differed across contexts in their social mobility [χ2(2) ~ 7.3–10.5, p < 0.025], whereas younger children (1–2 years old) were similar across contexts. Social mobility was significantly lower in the classroom compared with the playground and gymnasium (with no difference between the latter contexts) for older children. Visual analysis confirmed that disabled children (n = 3) engaged in substantially less time in social mobility (average 0–1%), compared with non-disabled, age-similar peers (2–3 years old average 1–12%) across all contexts. Conclusion A substantial gap exists between non-disabled and disabled children for social mobility. There is an increase in magnitude and variability of social mobility around age three that suggests the gap between non-disabled and disabled children will continue to widen.en_US
DepartmentUniversity of Delaware. Department of Physical Therapy.en_US
CitationLogan SW, Ross SM, Schreiber MA, Feldner HA, Lobo MA, Catena MA, MacDonald M and Galloway JC (2016) Why We Move: Social Mobility Behaviors of Non-Disabled and Disabled Children across Childcare Contexts. Front. Public Health 4:204. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00204en_US
DOIdoi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00204en_US
ISSN2296-2565en_US
URLhttp://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/21216
Languageen_USen_US
PublisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY 4.0,en_US
dc.sourceFrontiers in Public Healthen_US
dc.source.urihttp://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/public-healthen_US
TitleWhy We Move: Social Mobility Behaviors of Non-Disabled and Disabled Children across Childcare Contextsen_US
TypeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Logan2016_WhyWeMove with cover page_1475168145T8619.pdf
Size:
418.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: